GENERAL ASTRONOMY ARTICLES
ON the PROPER NAME ‘GACRUX’ and the
NAMING of OTHER SOUTHERN STARS
I N T R O D U C T I O N
First published during 1998 within the Astronomical Society of New South
Wales (ASNSW) journal “Universe”, the following article addresses the
somewhat inelegant and confusing origins in naming southern stars,
including the almost whimsical lack of any standard system or
conventions in its use. When I first created this website, I decided
re-examined the original text and made some important modifications,
then updated it for more current times. This current update makes
this 2016 version either the twelfth or thirteenth
incarnation!
Although this is probably quite esoteric and mostly
very one-sided in its view, it does usefully represent the general
confusion and poor means of communicating all star names for new
visual observers. Much of the text here is deliberately
tongue-in-cheek and applies some necessary humour, or
wantonly pokes fun at, an otherwise rather dry and uninspiring
subject.
I do hope that these meagre words also do provoke
some open thoughts and general discussion about the often very
baffling lexicon of star names. Whether such popular names can
really be changed or somehow usefully adopted is very doubtful. Yet
as we will soon find out, it is probably not totally impossible.
PLEASE ENJOY !
Latest Update : 01st December 2016
PROLOGUE
ORIGIN of STAR NAMES
Purposeful naming all the seeable stars in the nighttime sky
probably dates far back into prehistory. There is little doubt why
people wanted to do this. In the grand heavenly and unmistakable
vistas in the nightly southern skies, the brightest stars were
usually seen as prominent beacons in identify and recognised
familiar star patterns or constellations during the night or
throughout the year. This was importantly joined with the highly
regular cycles, such as the Earth daily spinning on its axis or its
long yearly journey orbiting the Sun. Such clockwork-regularity
could be assigned to the practical knowledge of the four
seasons or with other natural phenomena such as the coming of
seasonal or monsoonal rains, flooding of rivers or even the regular
yearly appearances of animals, insects, fruits or even the blooming
of flowering plants.
Tying all this into natural recurring events was very useful. No
doubt appearance at dusk or at dawn of familiar stars near the local
horizon were auspicious signs of regular predictable phenomena.
Names given for the brightest first magnitude stars like
Sirius, Arcturus, Rigel, Antares,
Vega, Aldebaran, and Capella; were likely known
even before any human written record. Such nightly emissaries
provided a good basis for descriptive stories related to their myths
and legends of their personal gods or deities, or even reflections
of daily activities such as hunting of wild game for food.
From the beginning of the first human settlements around 8000 BC,
each of the brighter stars were deemed of even greater importance,
and so began many of the prominent names that were passed down to us.
Many we still use today. No doubt, in many Ancient cultures, such
representation of the bright constellations mostly lead to some of
the older star names being handed down to more modern times.
Good examples are like the orange-coloured first magnitude
star, Aldebaran, being the brightest star of the prominent
zodiacal constellation — Taurus the Bull. Mythological stories
through many millennia talk around the brute power of the bull which
became strongly associated with male fertility and masculinity. This
central idea became the central or core part of the mythology and
worship in some cultures. Around 3500 BC, the ancient Bronze Age
Minoans celebrated powerful white bulls with either bull fighting,
dedicated dancing rituals. This also appeared mythological
bull-headed creature known as the Minotaur, which hidden its lair
within the maze known as the Cretan Labyrinth. So the star
Aldebaran became the central part of these old legends, mostly
because of its prominent orange or reddish colour, representing
drips of blood from some animal or human after the dangerous pointed
horn of the bull had gorged them. Although to this day we do not
really know of the true derivation or origin of the given name of
Aldebaran, there is little doubt remains such mythological stories
date back well into unrecorded prehistory.
Star names also often directly apply to the nature of the
constellation in which they reside. Orion the Hunter is one of the
oldest constellations, whose two first magnitude stars of
Betelgeuse and Rigel have names relating to his
shoulder and foot, respectively, of this very prominent group of
stars. Some also say in mythology, that prominent red Betelgeuse is
the very place where Taurus, the bull, pierced Orion’s own flesh, causing him to bleed. This
story, therefore, forever joins these two constellations together
through the Taurian star of Aldebaran.
In time, the naked-eye stars of lesser brightness were also given
proper names. These were mostly concerning with some
anatomical or geometric portion of some constellation outline.
Depending on the culture who described it, the body part sometime
became directly assigned as the star name from their common
language. Without doubt, this is the most common method of the
creation and generation of the now vast and seemingly endless
glossary of star names. As many cultures meet and started to
exchange knowledge about the stars, these other different
alternative assigned names were given to selected stars. As worldly
empires came and went, just like the origin of many common words we
see in the current modern dictionaries, some star names fell into
disuse and were soon quickly forgotten. Others were instead
reinvented, as either similar sounding names or recombinations of
the various older names. Here these final star names were to become
popular and standardised adoptions, even though their true origins
were long ago lost in the mists of time.
Since most of the significant old societies and cultures were
based in the northern hemisphere, for example, mostly from Europe,
Mesopotamia or Persia, Arabia, to the more eastward civilisations
like India, China and Japan; they found these numerous adapted star
names had become widespread in their popular usage. Hence, the now
well documented multiple common names for many of the bright
northern stars.
From our southern hemisphere, the less extensive and somewhat
more isolated human societies left huge gaps when naming all the
southern stars. Throughout human history, more than 90% of people
have lived north of the equator, and their cultures had little need
to name the southern skies — at least available in written
form or verifiable usage. This really affected only five bright
southern stars, being; Canopus, Alpha Centauri, Beta Centauri, Acrux
and Achernar.
Most commonly names adopted for these stars only date back
to the Arabic cultures in 5th Century AD. However, all inhabitants
of Australia, Africa and South America had different names for many
southern stars dating back many millennia. These names, until
recently, were supplanted by the conquering Western societies,
suppressing all the more traditional names. We can mostly attribute
the loss of these names because these stories of their origin are
passed via oral history down through countless generations. As these
ancient peoples often have ritualistic secrets only shared among the
elders or their spiritual leaders, those outside the group were not
privy to how their stars were originally named. This often was made
worst by not knowing or desiring to learn the local language, where
in time, enforcement of western values meant the original
information and meaning became fragmented or was simply just lost to
us forever. *
* Worst, this is historically atypical of cultural
destruction by religious zealots or the deliberate enforced
political will. Such wilfulness in my opinion should be placed even
higher than ‘crimes against
humanity’, whose perpetrators
should be liable for ‘crimes
against our entire human species’!
Erasing our collective shared history to promote some aberrant
worldview. It is the most serious act against everyone alive now and
our future descendants to come! Such outright barbarity should be
punishable by mandatory erasure of any recorded future of said
radicalised religion or political movement.
FEATURED ARTICLE
PROPER NAMING of SOUTHERN STARS
On a highly personal note, I have, for several decades, been
particularly annoyed about the use, or should I say abuse and
disuse, of the given or proper name for the bright southern
star γ Cru or Gamma Crucis.
Apparently, some seemingly bold upstart American (Yankee) observer
named it Gacrux, which, from what I can determine, happened
sometime during the early 20th Century. This bright orange star is
the 23rd brightest naked-eye star in the sky, which has the most
atrocious, highly inelegant, and unsophisticated name — at
least when compared to many other stars in the sky.
I still after several decades cannot find out its origin, but I
am sure I eventually will!
If the I.A.U. really has ratified this quite horrible and
terribly sounding name! Well… some drastic action might be
necessary At least, ‘Sky Atlas
2000.0’ Vol.1, pg.313 (Edition 1),
has put brackets around the name. I pray like hell that this is only
provisional. The name, anyway, brings terrible thoughts to the mind.
Perhaps our dear Gacrux is some kind of new drug or unmentionably
placed suppository.
Alternatively. Perhaps we should name it
Aurantiacus, being the Latin word describing an orange-red
colour, or the shortened Aurantia (au-ran-ti-a) that
describes an orange dye used in biological stains or even late-19th
century orange coloured filters. Another good possibility could be
Ochraceus or Ochrac (ouch-rack), which
describes the colour of reddish-yellow – and appropriately
based on colour ranges often seen between all younger and older
observers. (Oddly, there are not real words for the colour
orange in Latin, whose only assigned descriptor is mostly
deemed as a kind of red.) In my own humble opinion ; the
order of Crux stars as; Acrux, Mimosa,
Aurantia, just has a nice gentle ambience to it!
But what of all the other southern star names?
Well at least Alpha Crucis does perhaps have some ring of
originality in the name Acrux. I think this name is clever,
being simply based on the combination of Alpha as ‘a’ and Crux.
Its origin seems to be from the renowned 19th Century American
astronomer and populist, Elijah H. Burritt (1794-1838), who
had published many astronomical books and star atlases, prior and
after his death. Most were just directly aimed at the general
American population, along with several beautifully illustrated and
useful star atlases between the years 1833 and the subsequent
updates by other authors that ended in 1856. By the 1845 5th
edition, sales had reached over quarter-of-a-million copies
— somewhat equivalent in popularity to modern versions of
“Sky Atlas 2000.0”. Much of the southern stars nomenclature
was first given by Burritt, and some of this still remains
entrenched in our general astronomical vernacular.
Fig. 1. SHOWING CRUX, CENTAURUS and ACRUX Elijah H.
Burritt’s “Geography of the Heavens” (1856)
This figure shows just a small segment of
Burritt’s Star Atlas (1856), showing
the brightest star of Crux first named as Acrux. It also shows the
outlines of the southern portion of Centaurus, Circinus and Musca.
As there was no official agreement with the constellations in the
1850s, the names are varied. I.e. Crux is Cruz, and Musca is
called Musca Indica — the Indian Fly.
There are also many strange peculiarities to
some of these star positions, with Beta Crucis too far west and
Gamma Crucis is not properly aligned with Acrux. Also Alpha Centauri
(sometimes dubiously labelled Bungula) and Beta Centauri (Agena) are
too wide apart, even accounting for the large proper motion of α Cen. Furthermore, they and the Crux
stars should all be about 1° to 2° further south, while
the brightish star right next to α
Cen does not exist. (This could be θ Circini, some 2.8°SE away, but
this is 5th magnitude star and lies along the eastern arm of the set
of compasses.
The figure shows ε Cen, placed in the mid-belly of the
Centaur, however, is correctly positioned. α Circini is as well oddly not located as
the central hinge but has been made as an extension of the hind legs
towards the centaur hoof. This makes the compasses much smaller in
size, and importantly does not match the quite obvious asterism
making the thin triangle constituting of the stars α, β and
γ Cir. (3.2v, 4.1v and 4.5v,
respectively.)
In summary, this section of the map seems
poorly made, and it remains uncertain how these stellar positions
were obtained, though we do assumed it was an adopted from an atlas
made by Alexander Jamieson. Clearly E.H. Burritt never saw these
stars for himself and relied on other sources. I did a basic check
with the Paramatta Star Catalogue (1831) and that of Lacaillé
(1752), but the places do not match this chart. Why, for example, is
the Spanish name Cruz given for the Cross, and the Roman
given name for the star is presented as Acrux / Crux? (Perhaps a
clue that the positional source might likely to have been Spanish in
origin?) There are other oddities too. The Milky Way is much broader
and more irregular in brightness than what is displayed. Moreover,
the overlaid the famous Coalsack and the other dark regions are not
shown. Any visual observer should have realised this even with a
quick glance.
One of the first questions to why someone would want to name
stars they could NOT see seems just utterly crazy. However,
Burritt true target was more than likely hidden in his faith and
strict Baptist upbringing. His single motive appears to be derived
from the Biblical quote in Psalms, 147, 4, saying; “He [God] telleth the number of the stars
; he giveth them all their names.”
No doubt, Elijah Burritt felt he had either some divine revelation
or some sacred duty to teach (or preach) all the star names to the
masses. Most of the brighter ones as seen in the northern skies
already had given names, with many derived from ancient times
— links no doubt to the very times of their many celebrated
Christian prophets. However, waiting in the south were a great
plethora of unnamed stars. If they were so-named, then the
omnipotent presence of God would be elevated even higher in the
world. So doing God’s will was the
motivation.
Elijah presumably coined the star name Acrux, even though
from the high latitude of +41° North, he could never have
really observed the star himself! Another is the orange star of
Alpha Trianguli Austrinus or Atria, which combines the
word alpha and the first three letters of the southern
constellation of Triangulum plus ‘A’ from the
second word Austrinius. This seems not to be the name derived
by Elijah Burritt, though I could not really find the reference to
it in any other common literature sources. Again, I have to presume
it was from another fellow American star-naming mimic. At least in
“Sky Atlas 2000.0”, Vol.1, pg.404, gives the star its
provisional name. A better name in my opinion would perhaps be the
prettier word Atriaus. This usefully means this star cannot
be confused with stars of the other small northern constellation of
Triangulum. Alpha Triangulum Austrinius perhaps deserves an
improved (I.A.U. ratified) proper name, if only because it is also
the 33rd brightest star in the sky.
Interestingly, this method of some name combined with the
constellation for star names is not new. The first instance was the
alternative name for the open cluster of The Pleiades, as listed in
Bayer’s first 16th Century star atlas.
John Chilmead, an English writer on celestial and terrestrial
globes, terms the Pleiades instead as the Latin name of Tauria
Quasi Taurinae. This name, we believe, became bastardised to the
shortened form ‘Atauria’ sometime during medieval times. This
nomenclature did not stay, as the Biblical references referred to
the older name of the Pleiades. We cannot put forward the name ‘Atauria’, as it is easily confused with the bright
orange-red star of Alpha Tauri
/ Aldebaran.
Crux’s Other Stars
Some have even stretched this rather cold impersonal
draconian imperialism even further. In one of my first
copies of an astronomical computer program that ran on the now near
prehistoric Windows 3.1 was the ye ol’
‘Sky Map’ Version 2.2. Here the proper name for
Beta Crucis was given as Becrux! Nowhere else can I
find an earlier reference to this name. However, the actual
proper name for this star is commonly referred as Mimosa. I
also believe this is the same name has not been even ratified by the
I.A.U. either, yet it is the darn 20th brightest star in the sky! In
Sky Atlas 2000.0, the charts and Volume 1 of the atlas, has no
proper name for Mimosa, nor in fact, any other name is even
given!
Southern observers should also find some better name
to select for Gamma Crucis. In total disgust, I think we send
back Gacrux to the silly Americans whom damn well named it
this!
Then while we’re at it,
what should the brand new proper names be for the plainly obvious
stars in Crux of Delta (δ) and
Epsilon (ε) Crucis? Both
these stars also deserve proper names, as they are both very
conspicuously bright at 2.8v and 3.6v magnitude and are plainly
obvious. Why not? If both these stars were in, say, Ursa Major they
surely would be! If we don’t look out,
they will probably give them predictable Americanised names, like
Decrux and Epicrux! Yuckee! For bluish Delta Crucis,
perhaps Dimosa would be appropriate, being similar to the
fellow blue star Mimosa, but dimmer. (At least it is uses a slightly
different but clever naming system.)
As the symmetry breaker for the fifth and faintest star of the
Cross, another replacement name for wee Epsilon Crucis could be
perhaps be Castaneus or Castane, because it does aptly
describes the similar dirty-looking chestnut brown in its dismal
colouration. Another for ε Cru
could be Ictericus, Icteric or Icter being a
slightly jaundiced yellow colour. Under this naming regime, my
preferred names for the five stars of the Cross would then
become;
Acrux, Mimosa, Aurantia, Dimosa and Icter.
All these are quite logical placed and are rather
descriptive as well. Any takers? Oh well, it might not happen, but
then again, there is nothing at all wrong with free-thought and
dreaming!
Other Missing Southern Star Names
Stars in the southern skies missing given names is not so
unusual. A total of an amazing twenty other southern
constellations have no names for ANY of the bright stars they
contain! These include all the visually miserable little southern
constellations of;
Antlia, Apus, Ara, Caelum, Chameleon, Circinus,
Corona Australis, Fornax, Horologium, Hydrus,
Mensa, Microscopium, Musca, Octans, Pictor,
Pyxis, Reticulum, Telescopium, Tucana & Volans.
Within the Top 100 of stellar magnitudes, similar problems
exist. Most of southern ones are yet to be given proper names. They
include;
• 41st brightest : δ Vel /
Delta Velorum
• 61st brightest : β Gru /
Beta Grus
• 72nd brightest : γ Cen /
Gamma Centauri
• 84th brightest : ε Cen /
Epsilon Centauri
Note: Epsilon Centauri also points towards
ω Cen / Omega Centauri — also
bizarrely still nameless even though it is directly pointing towards
the brightest globular in the sky! This is also the common way
southern observers find the amazing globe of stars making up ω Centauri.
Pavo the Peacock
Now what about Alpha Pavonis or α Pav? This is a bright star with the
odd name of Peacock, even though Pavo has the English name
also means Peacock. Unlike most of the other constellations, the
star names are normally is the description of the anatomical or
physical part of the imagined figure representing this
constellation. In this particular instance, it does not. A reference
to Alpha Pavonis own inherited proper name is definitely American.
Being the 46th brightest star, its particularly solitary and lonely
place in the sky, the star really does deserve some much better name
than this seemingly ‘trumped-up’ version. Perhaps, in this instance, it
should be really called Apavo, or which I simply adore,
Pavlova!
For those who do not know, Pavlova the is the name of deliciously
sweet, being a famous and favourite Australian or New Zealand
dessert! The arguments has been truly monumental for decades. In the
future, this very issue of the country of origin of this sweet dish
could lead to the possibility of the breakout of war between these
nations! Yes, it is that serious!
Yet, Pavo is also a very peculiar constellation, because no other
star in the entire constellation has been given any proper name!
Star Names in Argo
More drastically, if I had my way, I would change the name of
α Car /
Canopus, whose name would then become Arobur (sounds
like a good name for some new fragrant perfume!), Acar or
Acarina. How about the really modern hip name, I
Coramba; but this is perhaps too reminiscent of the
Simpson’s character Bart Simpson! (and I’d probably be sued for breaching some brand
naming law. Heavens to mergatroids!, aka. from the old cartoon
character Snagglepuss
played during the 1960s )
Another star that also deserves a much better name is β Car / Beta Carinae near
the shared border of the southern constellations of Carina and
Chamaeleon. Beta Carinae is the 32nd brightest star in the sky
having the proper name of Miaplacidus, as first given by
Burritt in his 1856 book “Geography”. Origin of the name
Miaplacidus is not known, but again, this given name is just another
corruption being almost definitely invented by Burritt William
Higgins, the presumed authority regarding star names, derives it
from the Arabic name of Miah, as Miyah. It was Edmond
Halley in 1679 that originally placed this 1.86V magnitude star in
the now defunct constellation of Robur Carlolinium or Charles’ Oak. The ‘Oak’ was kept
until the explorer La Caillé complained that its addition
totally ruined completely the grand constellation of Argo. Due to
his very forthright comments, Robur disappeared (probably in spite)
from the charts between the years 1730 and 1735. In addition, the
star has changed designation three times, from Alpha Roburis, then
Beta Argûs to the today’s Beta
Carinae. This blue-white star perhaps should be called the more
modern Beargûs, Berobur, Becar or even Becarina, presuming we
follow the American precedents.
Does this mean the original name of
Miaplacidus is really better?
Does it matter? (In the end, probably not.)
Under the missing bright southern stars names in the Top 100
(above), the problem mostly appear within the False Cross,
which were collectively once in the prominent part of now defunct
constellation of Argo Navis, are likely the most perplexing.
All four False Cross stars are Delta Velorum, along with
Kappa Velorum or Markab (Markeb), Epsilon Carinae or Avior; and Iota
Carinae or Turais. As only the last two of these four stars listed
above are named. The first two of these stars mentioned have never
had truly popular names, and considering the False Cross is a major
asterism in the southern sky remains amazing silly.
δ Car
is presumably and very questionably known by the not very popular
Chinese name of Koo She. This seems solely to appear within
Richard Allen’s “Star Names” (1899) pg.73. However, Allen actually says
Koo She is TWO stars and therefore is likely an asterism, comprising
δ and ω. Wisely, I’d think Delta Velorum here really deserves
some decent alternative proper name, if only because of its overall
brightness. Koo She’s presumed
recognised name is mostly opportunistic way of slipping in naming
nomenclature just for the sake of popularity. Its name is supposed
to be associated with a “bow and
arrow”, but its meaning has lost its
association with the constellation. So should concluded the adopted
name should be either Koo or She? Perhaps my imaginary
Develor is possibly better suited? At the moment it appears
to me as nameless.
Three ‘False Cross’ stars that are formally named
include;
ε Car or
Avior was only relatively recently named whose origin became
first adopted by the English-based Her Majesty’s Nautical Almanac Office
(H.M.N.A.O.) in the 1930s, mainly to assist navigation by
aviators the Royal Air Force (R.A.F.) So again, this is another
example of a mishmash of names based this time on its practical use.
This origin is also similar to the second magnitude star
α Pav [See above],
was also named by those darn imperialistic English HMNAO do-gooders,
who can’t even see it!
ι Car
is named Aspidiske, or the usually preferred Turais.
Its name means “little shield”, and refers to the decoration placed near
the keel of the ship. Aspidiske is Greek word for this, where Turais
is the Arabic name. Less frequently used name of Scutulum is
again the same but in Latin!
κ Car
is named Markab or the usually preferred Markeb. The
star, according to Allen, derives from a table of stars made in
1521, where it last word applies to the alleged name. It is often
said that the name is Arabic, which is the name that also applies to
2.5 magnitude star. Alpha Pegasi / α Peg. Its meaning is equivalent to a kind
of ship or saddle, making sense with a ship like the Argo or a
saddle on a flying horse (though legend says Pegasus was without a
saddle.) I suspected the name was slotted in after Pegasus was
named, yet why this was done will remain unknown to us as no
reference explains it.
Clearly all this craziness is really quite maddening. Why name
Iota three separate times, and all essentially have the
exactly the same meaning, and then have two other stars so nearby
without any name at all! Worst, Iota is the third brightest
of these stars in the constellation at 2.3v magnitude, but nearby
Delta Velorum is roughly 0.4 magnitudes brighter, being placed
oppose star of Iota in the False Cross that has no given name at
all. Just plainly crackers! Perhaps the False Cross, with the
total emphasis on the word false, is not just because it only
mimics the brighter Southern Cross, but because it goes against the
general ‘rules of engagement’. This annoying problem notably does not
happen in most of the other bright constellations in the sky.
Frankly, it would not happen nor would be ever tolerated by many
amateur astronomers in the northern hemisphere, now would it?
Also, 55th brightest star in the sky, Lambda Velorum or λ Vel has been lately named as
Suhail (or Alsuhail / Al suhail.) This certainly is not
traditional. It comes from the Arabic word meaning either
brilliant, beautiful or glorious. However, it is brighter
than Iota Carinae but fainter by just a smidgen than the now still
unnamed Delta Carinae.
As I can say in just one word.
N U T S !
Some Interesting Personal Choices for Southern Stars
Adopting this Americanised nomenclature to the
highlighted “Top 100 Stars”,
this specifically becomes;
• Develor
• Lavelor
• Begrus
• Gacent
• Epcent
• Epicar would replace Avior
Others would include;
• Omega Centauri would be Omecent
• Kappa Velorum becomes Kavel or Kavelor
• Iota Carinae becomes Icar or Iotacar.
If this type of nomenclature is extended to all the
southern constellation carte blanché, we’ll end up with star names like ;
• Amusca (The first fly of summer)
• Behyis (Uncontrolled laughing after bee sting)
• Bemusca (A new men’s
fragrance)
• Acham (Alpha Cha; Arabic Chewing Gum?)
• Amen (Alpha Mensa; Still giggle at this one!)
• Amicro (A new petrol company?)
Others would be, and you can probably now guess them
all;
• Alteleos (Telescope eyepiece type)
• Etacar (Eta Carinae)
• Xicar (A new oven cleaner)
• Taucent (Yet another blokey fragrance)
• Depictor (New graphic computer software)
• Gaoctan (Japanese movie monster)
• Garet (or Garnet) (Something during lynchings)
• Acoraus (A new dinosaur species)
• Behoro (or Behor) (Hip new swear word)
• Etapus (Brother of Oedipus)
• Mucrux (New cough decongestant)
• Devolan (Japanese soft drink)
• Zemusca (A fly in your soup!)
Southern Star Names : The Bottom Line
So why should we bother naming these stars?
I believe, after teaching astronomy classes over several decades,
the naming of stars in the sky is quite important. They set out to
find regions of the unfamiliar constellations for the astronomically
uninitiated. Naming stars should quite naturally have some degree of
romance and history, instead of the cold hard science that astronomy
sometimes normally capitulates too. People while learning the stars,
will often ask, “What star is
that?“ Any proper name at least gives
them the appropriate head start. It also does make the subject of
astronomy interesting!
To give some really good examples. When I describe the stars in
the constellation of Crux, I point out Acrux, then Mimosa, Gacrux,
Delta Crucis then Epsilon Crucis. A terrible syntax gap here is
plainly obvious. I even once taught some overly enthusiastic
eleven year-old children some years ago;
“What are the names of the
stars in the Southern Cross?”, one perplexed child
asked.
Now, you try to adequately describe to children the names of
Delta and Epsilon Crucis by their designated Greek letters and
genitives! Is this important for school children? YES! They
darn well see it, the little darlings, everyday on both the
Australian and New Zealand National Flags!
A most entertaining proposal, at least that I can immediately
think of, is the naming of the four brightest stars of Crux (Alpha
to Delta.) As Baron Alexander von Humboldt first pointed out, these
names should be based on the four cardinal virtues of
Justice, Prudence, Fortitude and
Temperance. In terms of Acrux, Becrux, Gacrux and Delta
Crucis, our northern hemisphere counterparts could greatly learn
from these uses of the Humboldt star names. When directed to our
American astronomical counterparts, these ‘new’ names
could be well affirmed, justified or formally rejected!
The name for Epsilon Crucis in Humboldt’s scheme should be?
Well, I will just leave that to you!
An apt conclusion to this text is a general quotation
from the very last line at the end of Dante’s famous ‘Inferno’,
which is particularly suited to the gist of this wicked tome;
Thence we came forth to rebehold the stars.
I’ll say no more…
Andrew James : 03rd December 2016
General References
1. Kanas, Nick, “Star Maps :
History, Artistry and Cartography”, Springer (2007)
2. Allen, R.H., “Star Names : Their
Lore and Meaning”, Dover Pub.
(1963)
Notes
1) In the real world, simply the I.A.U.
controls all the astronomical names and terminology, so this
also does not mean that star names cannot be adopted, added or
changed. The I.A.U. is seemingly, and likely fortunately for us,
is a highly democratic and non-profit organisation whose
decisions are determined by established international
agreements. If many responses to some particularly favoured name
were suggested and they become commonly used, they could be
submitted for ratification, changed or just updated.
2) Any useful suggestions or comments on
common star names should be sent an email letter to me for
publishing into this web space. Meanwhile, an inquisitive letter
has just been (yet again) sent to the particular I.A.U.
Commission about information on the proper names used for the
bright southern stars. I will happily report the responses to
these Southern Astronomical Delights Pages if I ever do
get some presentable reply.
My Fellow Amateurs. Any ideas or comments?
Last Update : 01st December 2016
Southern Astronomical Delights ©
(2016)
For any problems with this Website or Document please e-mail me.
|